Wikipedia:Help desk

Welcome—ask questions about how to use or edit Wikipedia! (Am I in the right place?)

• For other types of questions, use the search box, see the reference desk or Help:Contents. If you have comments about a specific article, use that article's talk page.
• Do not provide your email address or any other contact information. Answers will be provided on this page only.
• If your question is about a Wikipedia article, draft article, or other page on Wikipedia, tell us what it is!
• Check back on this page to see if your question has been answered.
• For real-time help, use our IRC help channel, #wikipedia-en-help.
• New editors may prefer the Teahouse, a help area for beginners (but please don't ask in both places).

Ask a question

September 7

Article italicization

I can't find the code in Peter Potamus, which shouldn't be italicized. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:45, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

@Clarityfiend: {{Infobox television}} will automatically italizise the title unless you set "italic_title=no" RudolfRed (talk) 00:51, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Thanks. The article is actually about the TV series, which should be italicized, so I have requested a page move. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:05, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Clarityfiend, the article is confusing because the lead seems to be about the character but the title and infobox seem to be about the TV show. Can you correct that? Cullen328 (talk) 04:16, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Sfn in Efn (or something better)

Draft:Marienaltar (Conrad von Soest) (not my creation) had [ a laborious referencing system]; partly to improve the draft, partly to increase my fluency with Template:Sfn (which I've usually been too lazy to use), I suggested replacing it. I got approval, and have started. As you'll quickly see, the conversion is currently ... half baked.

Note (d) currently reads "For example ^[12]." I want it instead to read "For example Engelbert 1995, pp. 161ff.", though I'm most open to the alternative, better suggestions of editors skilled in the necessary arts. -- Hoary (talk) 02:54, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Hey Hoary. Maybe you'd like to use Template:Harvnb? It's like Sfn that isn't wrapped in ref tags (I'm simplifying). Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 03:00, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Excellent, Firefangledfeathers; just what I wanted. Thank you! -- Hoary (talk) 04:15, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

bookmark or watch list a page

Hello, When I find an interesting article on the web I can bookmark it with a title that is provided or I can rename. For the life of me I can't find a star or a watch button anywhere on any page I visit. I would think it would be easy to keep track of your studies. Please help me. Thanks I'm a newbie but a monthly contributor. Deanprine (talk) 05:36, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Deanprine, this does not seem to be a question about Wikipedia (which is what this page is for), but instead a question about the web in general. You could ask it at Wikipedia:Reference desk/Computing; but if you do so, be sure to specify the browser that you are using. -- Hoary (talk) 06:10, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

@Deanprine: See WP:WATCHLIST for how to get notifications when an article or other Wikipedia page changes, but I am not sure that is what you mean. RudolfRed (talk) 19:09, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

I mean - keeping track in a file within wiki the pages I visit to remind me of my research. Thanks Deanprine (talk) 00:55, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

@Deanprine: I feel you're better off using some type of management software for that if it's not related to Wikipedia. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 01:36, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Paragraph line break issue

When I insert two newlines in Chocolate#History it is formatting it as a space. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 06:53, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

I'm not sure which edits you are referring to but the net effect of your recent changes has been to remove large chunks of the article. I don't doubt you have good intentions but I think you should have mentioned on the article's Talk Page that you intended to make such big changes, with a summary of what you are hoping to achieve. Mike Turnbull (talk) 10:31, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

The edits I'm referring to are "containers.[24][25][26] While Spanish" are separated by a space, even when I try to make it a new paragraph.

I've just rewritten History of chocolate and have nominated it for GA. So have rewritten Chocolate#History as a summary of that article, and used Template:main to try to denote that it is what I'm doing. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 10:46, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

I added a {{clear}} template which fixed the problem, which (I guess) was caused by the adjacent image. Mike Turnbull (talk) 11:18, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Thankyou, very helpful. Good to know about that template. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 11:40, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Spoke too soon, on my device I can see it has created a very large gap in the page. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 11:41, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Yes, that can sometimes be a problem with that template. Just revert my addition. I don't know why the standard double newline character didn't work. I tried three newline characters, which did work but gave extra space. We'll have to wait for User:PrimeHunter to explain how to fix it! Mike Turnbull (talk) 11:51, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

I would have made the same fix as Deor. I actually tested it in preview but didn't have more time. PrimeHunter (talk) 00:14, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

@Rollinginhisgrave: I'm not sure why it worked, but I've added a carriage return after the image call at the beginning of the section, and it appears to be displaying correctly now. Deor (talk) 15:00, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Citing ProQuest

What's the best way to cite an article from ProQuest? Should I enter "https://www.proquest.com/docview/" + the article id in the URL parameter or should I use the template:ProQuest in the id parameter? Or should I do both? Or can I put the template in the URL parameter? Or is there a completely different and better way to do this? TipsyElephant (talk) 09:21, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

@TipsyElephant There are some good examples of ProQuest sources in the article Elayne Harrington created recently (not by me). Citations #9, #11, #14 and #16 show the result. Mike Turnbull (talk) 10:25, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Mike beat me to it, I had the same example in mind. I saw the ID-thing somewhere else and used it. These takes manual work to fill in the data, I don't know of any autofill-gadget that "gets" ProQuest. Come to think of it, using both url and ID params may be redundant, though harmless. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:30, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Yeah, redundant. But if you must include |url=, mark it with |url-access=subscription so that readers don't click away from en.wiki only to discover that they don't have access. When using |url= also include |via=ProQuest so that readers aren't surprised when the land there when they expected to land at Sunday Independent, etc.

—Trappist the monk (talk) 12:08, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Good point. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 13:24, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Any way to mass categorize pages?

Is there a way to create and add to a category a group of pages at once, without having to go to each page separately? BlackYaroslav (talk) 17:02, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

BlackYaroslav You could ask at Wikipedia talk:Categories for discussion. This would be a bad idea if the category is in any way controversial. TSventon (talk) 17:20, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

September 8

Flagging article for deletion/merging?

I've stumbled upon a page that, at its very best, should be merged into another page. More realistically, this page is full of biased viewpoints; single-sided references that ignore a large amount of peer-reviewed literature in an area of scientific research that is currently being hotly debated online, at conferences, and in published research papers; and subtle jabs at anyone who holds different viewpoints. Further, almost the entirety of this article has been written and edited by a single Wikipedia user. I'm not super experienced with all the rules here, but everything about this article seems... antagonistic to the spirit of Wikipedia.

How do I go about bringing this article to the attention of someone more experienced with matters such as this? FoldedGenes (talk) 02:05, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Well, you could start by posting a WP:BLUELINK here, so we would know which article you're referring to and could review for ourselves. :) DonIago (talk) 02:40, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Seed_oil_misinformation URL replaced by wikilink by ColinFine (talk) 09:04, 8 September 2024 (UTC) FoldedGenes (talk) 04:44, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

FoldedGenes, I am endlessly bemused by editors who come to the Help Desk to complain about some article without mentioning which article. There are 6,880,084 articles at this moment, and Help Desk volunteers are not mind readers. Cullen328 (talk) 06:14, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Cullen328, to be fair to FoldedGenes, it seems reasonable to me to want to avoid confusing (A) general problems as these arise (in FoldedGenes' judgment) in Seed oil misinformation with (B) matters that are specific to Seed oil misinformation and (again in FoldedGenes' judgment) irrelevant to the problems. But to look at the complaint/question: It's normal for "almost the entirety of [an] article has been written and edited by a single Wikipedia user". There's nothing wrong with that. Is this single user proprietorial about the article they've created? If so, then there is (or at least seems to be) a problem. I note that there's currently no discussion at Talk:Seed oil misinformation, which is probably where to start. If you believe you're likely to have a policy-based reason for merging the valuable part of the article into some other article, then take a deep breath, read and digest Wikipedia:Merging, and proceed according to its requirements & recommendations. -- Hoary (talk) 07:40, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

A serious article on seed oil and health should mention that while consumption of unprocessed seed oil may be harmless, partially hydrogenated seed oils are mildly carcinogenic. The partial hydrogenation results in trans-linked double bonds in the product. Maproom (talk) 07:05, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Herbert Plumer, 1st Viscount Plumer

Please check ref. 32 - it is in red, thanks 2001:4479:6502:2F00:ADA8:1E6C:FB01:A10B (talk) 03:35, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

 Done please note that the title= field typically refers to the title of the specfific article you're citing and work= / jounrnal= / newspaper= refer to title of the whole thing. -- D'n'B-t -- 06:04, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Victor Cavendish, 9th Duke of Devonshire

Please check ref number 22. - I got it wrong and I'm confused. These are the pages: 390-391. Sorry 2001:4479:6502:2F00:ADA8:1E6C:FB01:A10B (talk) 03:36, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

 Done see above. -- D'n'B-t -- 06:04, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguating categories

Hello. I've noticed that there's a category requiring disambiguation, but I can't find any policy guidelines on the right way to do it.

Category:People from Midlothian is for people from the county in Scotland, and it's a subcategory of Category:Midlothian -> Category:People associated with Midlothian. There's also Category:People from Midlothian, Illinois, and Category:People from Midlothian, Virginia, which are for places in the US named after the place in Scotland. I haven't searched yet, but I'm betting that bios for people from one of the five Midlothians in the US are getting added to Category:People from Midlothian by mistake.

I could hatnote Category:People from Midlothian, since it seems to be the category equivalent of a WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, or I could start a CFD discussion to move Category:People from Midlothian, Scotland with the redirect then containing Template:Category disambiguation, which would probably bring the Wrath Of Scotland down upon my head. :-) But it seems likely that I just haven't found the policy guideline on this yet. Thanks for any advice. Wikishovel (talk) 11:21, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Wikishovel You could ask about the policy at Wikipedia talk:Categories for discussion. In practice categories can be disambiguated when the article isn't, e.g. Birmingham and Category:People from Birmingham, West Midlands. Category:People from Midlothian already has a note "This category lists people from Midlothian, Scotland". I have previewed the members of the category and almost all of them are Scottish or British and the remainder were born or brought up in Midlothian, Scotland. TSventon (talk) 12:20, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for checking that category, and also for the idea of asking at CFD talk - I'll try that. Wikishovel (talk) 12:32, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Media person Billy Carson AKA William Tyrone Karlson

Hey!

Hard to find where to post about this. I am new here and was wondering if some one could save some fools from falling in to this scam and make an actual wikipedia page about this person. To my knowledge he and his guru business have been getting a lot of publicity during past years and his team is attacking critical publications by doing search stuffing and copyright reporting. For example they have done a fake Wikipedia page about him at Wikitia.

Here is a video about the mediaperson and self claimed guru in question: https://youtu.be/eKRybDUCKU8?si=EFdmL6l16kvQGvXC Jr.dumbo (talk) 16:24, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Hey @Jr.dumbo. Inclusion of living people on Wikipeida usually must meet the basic notability guideline and according to a quick Google search, both of these names don't seem to meet it. You must also remember that Wikipedia is not for advocacy. So while I understand why you would like an article on Wikipedia about him, I don't believe he should get an article. Also for clarification, Wikitia and Wikipedia aren't in any way associated, they just both use the MediaWiki software. Wikitia is a "paid" wiki. Regards, win8x (talking | spying) 17:13, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

He has appeared on shows like Joe Rogan show and has apparently published multiple books. Jr.dumbo (talk) 23:48, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Anyone can publish books these days; that is not relevant. Shantavira|^{feed me} 08:03, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for replying. Anyone with a bit of money has been able to publish books for over 100 years, and e-books for over 25 years. I stated it because it was just one mentioned criteria somewhere in the guideline jungle. This person has tens of millions of views on his appearances in different entertainment / alternative education formats like JRE and he is portrayed as some sort of academic expert (which he is absoliutely not).

From what I have done little research on this person he is a very notable public figure in the field of alternative truth; about pretty much everything from physics to medical science and history. Thus I do firmly believe you guys would make a favour to many uneducated people, who look up to wikipedia as a source of validation and autherity, by hosting a fact based site about this public figure. Jr.dumbo (talk) 10:58, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

, "the field of alternative truth" is generally termed "fringe [whatever]" here; e.g. "fringe physics". (There are other terms; e.g. for history there's "historical negationist".) Recommended reading: Wikipedia:Fringe theories. -- Hoary (talk) 11:44, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Protection for certain pages: touchy religious topics

I was a major contributor to Asherah and Kuntillet Ajrud Inscriptions, they've been rather chipped away at by the sensitive pious since I stopped paying attention to them. Could an admin protect them, and El Shaddai? Temerarius (talk) 17:13, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

WP:RFPP is the right venue for this. win8x (talking | spying) 17:17, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, I've submitted requests there.

Temerarius (talk) 21:40, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Correct approach to list style - Lists of works

Hi all -- I've helped put together a few articles that are lists of works by specific artists - List of works by Sam Gilliam, List of works by Félix González-Torres, List of works by Faith Ringgold, etc. - and I'm currently working to clean up and expand List of works by Dan Flavin. I was wondering if there are any clear guidelines about list styles - in this case, I'm wondering if a series of basic plain lists or a series of tables would be more appropriate. I recall reading somewhere that tables are less accessible for screenreaders and thus generally less desirable, but I also remember reading something about tables being cleaner in terms of data separation. Is there any guidance on which option would be more appropriate? Thanks! 19h00s (talk) 19:14, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

IMO only use a table if NOT using one will be quite confusing. If you can get away without a table, do so. TooManyFingers (talk) 23:35, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

I am not familiar with the detail, but the Wikipedia:Featured list criteria link to Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Accessibility#Lists for lists and Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Accessibility/Data tables tutorial for tables. TSventon (talk) 01:29, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Thank you! 19h00s (talk) 02:05, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Best auto-archiving bot?

Is there a consensus about which bot is the best for automatic archiving of talk pages. I'm thinking of adding one to Talk:Electoral fraud in the United States. Jc3s5h (talk) 19:36, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

See Help:Archiving a talk page. There are two bots you may use, User:lowercase sigmabot III and User:ClueBot III. Both do the job well, but I believe sigmabot is more common. win8x (talking | spying) 21:41, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Requesting revdel via oversight

(Just asking) If a page justifies at least revdel, then is it alright to contact WP:OVERSIGHT since there isn't a place to do that for some reason? JuniperChill (talk) 22:55, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

That's what I did before I had my mop if it was bad enough to not discuss on an admin talk page. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:58, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Pkilla Musik

I want to publish this on Wikipedia's main page I really want a rapper Wikipedia page for Pkilla Musik? Pauldowe3 (talk) 22:58, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Pauldowe3

When a new editor tries to create an article, they usually have a frustrating and miserable time, because they have not yet learnt much about what a Wikipedia article requires.

My earnest advice to new editors is to not even think about trying to create an article until you have spent several weeks - at least - learning about how Wikipedia works by making improvements to existing articles. Once you have understood core policies such as verifiability, neutral point of view, reliable, independent sources, and notability, and experienced how we handle disagreements with other editors (the Bold, Revert, Discuss cycle), then you might be ready to read your first article carefully, and try creating a draft.

Your draft is nothing like a Wikipedia article. Wikipedia has little interest in what the subject of an article says or wants to say about themselves, or what their associates say about them. Wikipedia is almost entirely interested in what people who have no connection with the subject, and who have not been prompted or fed information on behalf of the subject, have chosen to publish about the subject in reliable sources. If enough material is cited from independent sources to establish notability, a limited amount of uncontroversial factual information may be added from non-independent sources. ColinFine (talk) 23:02, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Goddess on the Throne

 Courtesy link: Goddess on the Throne

Do you think that this is sound reasoning and use of tools (resored revision)? It makes little sense in my book and I wanted to seek another opinion. [1] — Sadko (words are wind) 23:15, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Instead of asking leading questions, please just state the problem. TooManyFingers (talk) 23:40, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Better still, OP, please follow the process at WP:DR. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 08:30, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

September 9

What is wrong with this doi please?

In Forests in Turkey as you can see there is an error for the “Bilir, Nebi” cite. I looked at the help info but I am not very familiar with doi and am struggling to figure out the problem. Any clues appreciated. Chidgk1 (talk) 06:54, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

@Chidgk1: You had an incomplete DOI value; fixed here. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 08:24, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Political

Sdpi secular dermicular party of India member kolar 2409:40F2:3E:A219:8555:7203:C2D9:FE32 (talk) 11:25, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Hi there, did you have a question about editing Wikipedia? Qcne (talk) 13:28, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Question frame

I do not have the question frame on the main page Mlshettle (talk) 20:20, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Does Wikipedia:Help_desk#Search_tool give you the answer? -- Hoary (talk) 22:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Hey, @Mlshettle. What do you mean by the "question frame"? If you are talking about the search bar, try unzooming your page. win8x (talking | spying) 22:29, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

search box

where the hell is the search box? IT appeared once and then disappeared. 74.128.146.116 (talk) 21:17, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Perhaps Wikipedia:Help desk#Search tool will help. -- Hoary (talk) 22:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Now archived at Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2024 September 6#Search tool. Mike Turnbull (talk) 15:19, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Search box

What happened to the search box. I can't find it. Tcool57 (talk) 14:57, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

@Tcool57 It is still there but takes various forms (e.g. a magnifying-glass icon) depending on your device and zoom level. See Wikipedia:Help_desk/Archives/2024 September 6#Search tool for more details. Mike Turnbull (talk) 15:01, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Finding date in a URL from archive.org

How can a person determine the date of an archive at archive.org when the date does not appear on the page? archive-url= requires |archive-date= says, "... the archival date can be found in the |archive-url=; ...", but it doesn't explain how to find the date.

For example, I'm looking at https://web.archive.org/web/20190329223116/https://catalog.afi.com/Person/151033-Victor-Potel I can see that the first eight digits might be interpreted as indicating March 29, 2019, but that's just my guess. Does Wikipedia have a guide somewhere with more on this topic? Eddie Blick (talk) 21:32, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

First eight digits of the timestamp: YYYYMMDDhhmmss: 20190329223116 → 2019-03-29 or 29 March 2019 or March 29, 2019.

—Trappist the monk (talk) 21:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

The page the OP cited (and all other Wayback Machine pages I've seen) also includes the archive date, in yellow, near the right of the "capture bar" at the top of the screen. Deor (talk) 22:58, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Thank you, @Trappist the monk and @Deor. I appreciate that feedback. Now I can resume adding archive links to citations. Eddie Blick (talk) 01:09, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

photo upload

Hello- I recently tried to upload a photo that I took of Renate Stendhal, for her wikipedia page. The photo was deleted, so I tried again and then my account was blocked for a week. I don't understand why I am unable to upload a photo which I took, so I own the rights to? Laurenmarler (talk) 22:16, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

You have no blocks on the English Wikipedia. You were blocked on Commons for disregarding warnings. You'll need to ask there about it, though connected, Commons is a separate project. 331dot (talk) 22:27, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

c:User talk:Laurenmarler gives the reasons for the deletions. That page contains plenty of links to further explanations. If you still don't understand, c:Commons:Village pump/Copyright is where to ask. If you do understand the issues involved and want to appeal against the deletion, try c:Commons:Undeletion requests. -- Hoary (talk) 00:29, 10 September 2024 (UTC) [revised]

c:Help _desk might also help. I'm really only responding because it gives me an excuse to begin my response with ::[[:c: Maproom (talk) 06:45, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Long story short: you apparently didn't correctly enter information to show that you took the photo and are releasing the rights under the appropriate licence – without this information, Commons cannot know that you are not using someone else's copyright and un-released photo. The fact that you tried to re-upload it, still without the necessary information correctly entered, re-inforced the impression that you were uploading it illicitly.

Note that the warnings and explanations given on your Commons Account Talk page are standard, and may not completely match this case, but you need to follow the instructions and go through the proper procedures.

Please understand that people try to upload other's copyright images without legal permission very frequently, so Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons have to follow strict procedures to avoid hosting (and being legally liable for) copyright infringement. Hope this helps. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 94.6.83.137 (talk) 08:24, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

September 10

WP:SIGCOV Question

I'm trying to make sure I'm understanding WP:SIGCOV. I'm talking with an editor on Rosemary's Baby (franchise), while we've found sources that mention a franchise, they talk about the films/tv shows and other items individually after. Does SIGCOV mean it has to discuss the topic as a whole? Because that's my understanding. and I want to make sure i'm not getting it wrong for another editor and bickering over nothing. Please ping me if you reply, I'll subscribe either way, but it helps me out.Andrzejbanas (talk) 03:27, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Andrzejbanas, as I see it, if a reliable source mentions a show business franchise, and then goes on to discuss the various components of the franchise, like a movie, a novel, a TV show, comic books, or other related items, then that is significant coverage of the franchise. That is what a show business franchise is after all: an assemblage of various closely related entertainment components. Cullen328 (talk) 06:13, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

While I gather that seems well and good, but what's the point of the article? It feels like it just reiterates what the other items are. Is that really following SIGCOV? because I can't seem to seperate it unless it's talking about the topic at large more specifically. If only talks about ehe elements of it, I feel like it's kind of falling apart in that sense. Andrzejbanas (talk) 08:09, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Alan E. Cober

I went to add Alan E. Cober as illustrator of The Dark is Rising it wouldn't link when the brackets were added. There's a page for him! DMc75771 (talk) 03:39, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Hi @DMc75771: ! I think the issue might have been the spacing between the name. If the text is kept on one line, that seemed to have fixed your problem. Andrzejbanas (talk) 04:58, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Is this vandalism?

I saw a user make these edits to the Wikipedia page for Fireman Sam. Page Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fireman_Sam&oldid=1244991118 Is this vandalism? You can see the history, because there are more edits like this... Cooldudeseven7 (Discuss over a cup of tea?) 12:59, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

@Cooldudeseven7 Our definition of vandalism is all about editing....deliberately intended to disrupt I looked at the IP's contribution history and it seems they made a similar silly edit on another article (also now reverted), which leads me to suspect they were deliberately doing what they were doing, rather than just being incompetent. As they have stopped for the moment, no other action is needed at present. Mike Turnbull (talk) 15:16, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Thank you so much! Cooldudeseven7 (Discuss over a cup of tea?) 15:30, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

i have publish my edit of biography but dont know how to move it into the live space

i have publish my edit of biography but dont know how to move it into the live space Ahmad87861 (talk) 16:35, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Ahmad87861. I have added a header to User:Ahmad87861/sandbox that will allow you to submit it for review when it is ready.

Unfortunately, it is nowhere near ready for review, and has no chance at all of being accepted in its current form.

A Wikipedia article should be a summary of what reliable independent sources have published about a subject: nothing less, and very little more.

Consequently writing an article begins with finding suitable sources - because it you can't find any, you will know that the subject does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for notability, and not to spend any more time on it.

Please read WP:YFA carefully.

My earnest advice to new editors is to not even think about trying to create an article until you have spent several weeks - at least - learning about how Wikipedia works by making improvements to existing articles. Once you have understood core policies such as verifiability, neutral point of view, reliable, independent sources, and notability, and experienced how we handle disagreements with other editors (the Bold, Revert, Discuss cycle), then you might be ready to read your first article carefully, and try creating a draft. ColinFine (talk) 17:07, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia mobile app question

I just installed the Android Wikipedia mobile app on my phone. I logged in, poked around, then wanted to log out but I didn't see any way to do that. I finally disconnected from Wi-Fi and powered off my phone. How do I log out? Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:38, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

I don't think you can: see m:Wikimedia Apps/Android FAQ. But why do you want to? ColinFine (talk) 17:13, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

I don't have any apps on my phone that I can log out from, other than by closing the app. 331dot (talk) 17:16, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

@Bbb23 Go to the App info from your Android device settings. Then click Clear Storage. That'll reset the app to default settings and log you out. Qcne (talk) 17:21, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Multiple replies. I didn't see anything on the FAQ (and the link you provided doesn't work). I normally edit on a PC and sometimes edit on a tablet; in both cases I log out; feels better. How do I "close" the app? I don't want to "reset the app".--Bbb23 (talk) 17:29, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

@Bbb23 You can navigate to the app list and swipe away to pause the process. This won't log you out though. Qcne (talk) 17:33, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

This is just an update on what has happened at my end. I powered back on my phone. I opened the Wikipedia app. I was still logged in, which, for me at least, was a surprise. However, this time, I went to the app's Settings and there was a place to log off. It warned me that it would log off on "all devices", and when I clicked it, it logged me off the phone and here on my PC. Anyway, although I still have a few unrelated questions about the app, I'm gonna stop here. TBH, I don't really want to use my phone to look at or edit Wikipedia. The screen is just too small. I'll probably leave it installed, just not use it.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:20, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

The Jemez Language page.

The Jemez Language (Towa) is to not be written as it is against traditional ruling. I hope you will take it down as it is not allowed by Pueblo officials. People not from the Pubelo of Jemez are to not learn the Jemez Language. 208.77.76.246 (talk) 16:40, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

See WP:NOTCENSORED, specifically "Some organizations' rules or traditions call for secrecy with regard to certain information about them. Such restrictions do not apply to Wikipedia, because Wikipedia is not a member of those organizations; thus, Wikipedia will not remove such information from articles if it is otherwise encyclopedic.". Wikipedia is not bound by restrictions on what Pueblo people can learn. If they are not permitted to learn the language, they should stay away from that article. 331dot (talk) 16:59, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

I think you are a bit mistaken; the proscription is not against the Jemez people but against people who are not members of the Jemez pueblo.

—Trappist the monk (talk) 17:30, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Thank you; I understand that, but my overall point remains the same- Wikipedia isn't bound by rules like that. 331dot (talk) 17:32, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

https://jemezenterprises.com/history-2/ says: "Jemez is the only culture that speaks this language, and our traditional law forbids our language from being translated into writing in order to prevent exploitation by outside cultures." Insiders are apparently also disallowed to write the language. I don't know whether outsiders are disallowed to learn the language by listening. Either way, Wikipedia doesn't adhere to such rules, at least not the English Wikipedia. PrimeHunter (talk) 18:52, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Unable to create account

I'm trying to create an account, but it tells me: "Visitors to Wikipedia using your IP address have created 6 accounts in the last 24 hours, which is the maximum allowed in this time period. As a result, visitors using this IP address cannot create any more accounts at the moment. If you would like to request an account be created for you, follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account."

I have a dynamic IP address from a major ISP, Telefonica, and I tried getting a new IP address half a dozen times, but it keeps telling me that error. I feel like something is wrong with it. How could every IP address I get have been used already to create so many accounts? It takes about ten minutes for me to restart my router and get a new IP, so I can't keep trying indefinitely.

I also looked at the "Request an account" page, but it says I'm required to provide a proper e-mail address, i.e. not a throwaway one like yopmail, that I usually use. I don't want to link my real address, and I don't know how else to get an address, because I don't use gmail or things like that, where they require you to provide your phone number.

Thanks for any assistance. 78.55.110.54 (talk) 23:06, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

You can wait 24 hours and try again. ‹hamster717🐉› ^{(discuss anything!🐹✈️ • my contribs🌌🌠)} 23:27, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Where does it say you cannot use a throwaway email address? I don't see that at WP:ACC, but maybe I missed it. 331dot (talk) 23:50, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

You can create an account at a friend or family members location. 331dot (talk) 00:11, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

You must be able to read emails during the requested account process but it's not required after that, and you are free to delete the email address at Special:Preferences when the account has been created. Note however that without a working email address stored in your account, you cannot gain access to the account if you forget the password. Some users have claimed their password stopped working but I suspect they just forgot it. Maybe you can create the account from another IP address when you have access, e.g. using a smartphone at a Wi-Fi hotspot somewhere. It's optional to give an email address if you create an account on your own. PrimeHunter (talk) 00:24, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

September 11

Wikidata getQualifierValue

By using the information from Module:Wikidata, I managed to fetch some information. On a page about a species (like this one), I can get the taxon name (property P225) using {{#invoke:Wikidata|getValue|P225|FETCH_WIKIDATA}}. However, I'd also like to get the taxon author (qualifier P405) and taxon year of publication (qualifier P574). The Module page says I should use getQualifierValue or getRawQualifierValue, but doesn't give an example on how to write the code to get that. How should I do that? Thanks! Mateussf (talk) 00:39, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

@Mateussf: Module:Wikidata says:

The other modules have more documentation. PrimeHunter (talk) 00:49, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Oh, you're right, thanks, I'd missed that!

Now I tried with Module:WikidataIB but I don't know what to put in pval=. For other properties, there's a Q item for each one. However, for P405 there's no Q item, just a string of text.

I tried this: {{#invoke:WikidataIB |getQualifierValue |qid=Q15381155|P105 |pval= |qual=P405 |name=xyz |fetchwikidata=ALL }}, and I tried with other things in pval=, but it didn't work.

Fortunately, with Module:Wd it worked just fine! {{#invoke:wd|qualifier|P225|P405}}, {{#invoke:wd|qualifier|P225|P574}} returns just what I want! Thanks!

Mateussf (talk) 01:13, 11 September 2024 (UTC)